Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: S. P., A CHILD (MOTHER)" Results 221 - 240 of 556
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Nott’s relationship has become strained; they separated in 2011 and then sought to obtain a divorce. [read post]
31 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The starting point for the father’s application should have been his continuing obligation to provide the mother with $1,500 in maintenance and $1,500 in child support per month. [read post]
31 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The starting point for the father’s application should have been his continuing obligation to provide the mother with $1,500 in maintenance and $1,500 in child support per month. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:35 pm
I recently came across an Op-Ed in the Los Angeles Times last Mother's Day, May 10, entitled "I lost my mother in my divorce. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:21 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The attorney for the child also took the position that the father placed the child's needs first. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:04 am
Roberts, 345 P.3d 1226, 2015 UT 24 (Supreme Court of Utah 2015). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Again, this assumption is often either pretermitted for purposes of lodging a dispositive motion, conceded, or included as part of the challenge to an expert witness’s opinion’s admissibility. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
When confronted with a copy of the text message, Father admitted that he had sent the text "to let A.L. know that he was no longer in Applebee's where they were having a meal and had moved to the Barnes and Noble as he prefers using their toilet" (Plaintiff's #6 at p.6). [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
When confronted with a copy of the text message, Father admitted that he had sent the text "to let A.L. know that he was no longer in Applebee's where they were having a meal and had moved to the Barnes and Noble as he prefers using their toilet" (Plaintiff's #6 at p.6). [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:36 am by INFORRM
The case started when the childs mother, Ms C, gave interviews to the media saying that she was living in the prince’s Paris apartment and that she received an allowance from him, as being the mother of his illegitimate child. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
", forcing Mother to order him to leave in front of the child. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:08 am
Absent evidence to the contrary, as earlier noted, it is generally in a childs best interests to have “substantial, frequent, meaningful and continuing parenting time with both parents. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 9:05 am by Daniel Schwartz
What’s interesting, though is that in a case earlier this year in federal court, the court looked not to the reasonable belief but to the doctor’s restrictions as the basis of the claim. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 17 February 2015, the Court of Appeal (Moore-Bick P, Black and Lewison LJJ) gave judgment in the case of JX MX (A child proceeding by her Mother and Litigation Friend Mrs AXMX) v. [read post]