Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF FORTH"
Results 221 - 240
of 478
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2016, 6:55 am
The punitive damages award was upheld on a post-trial motion with the judge considering the three guideposts for evaluating the size of a punitive damages award set forth by the U.S. [read post]
Manage Retaliation Risks In Response To Updated EEOC Enforcement Guidance, Rising Retaliation Claims
31 Aug 2016, 2:02 am
While an employer is free to bring these to light in the EEO matter where it may rightly affect the outcome, the Retaliation Regs state it is unlawful retaliation for an employer to take matters into its own hands and impose consequences for participating in an EEO matter. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 6:51 am
But the health center was adamant the employee should not be reinstated and took the matter to court. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:48 pm
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:48 pm
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:48 pm
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:09 am
R.C. 1303.31 sets forth who can obtain such a judgment. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
”Clerk commenced a CPLR Article 78 action seeking a court order compelling Board to reinstate her to her office retroactively with full back pay, alleging, among other things, that Village’s action terminating her from office was arbitrary and capricious, and in violation of Public Officers Law §36. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 8:35 am
Making matters worse for employers, unused leave, in whatever amount, must be carried over at year-end. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm
Bathrooms have been at the center of several recent controversies—most notably, of course, involving North Carolina’s HB2, an unconstitutional law that prevents transgender individuals from using bathrooms that align with their gender identity at any public school or university and in any governmental building. [read post]
2 May 2016, 7:00 am
The Court of Appeal held that the applicable statute of limitations for malicious prosecution claims was not the one-year, but rather the two-year, limitation period set forth in Cal. [read post]
2 May 2016, 7:00 am
The Court of Appeal held that the applicable statute of limitations for malicious prosecution claims was not the one-year, but rather the two-year, limitation period set forth in Cal. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:00 am
" Further, said the Commissioner, “even if noncompliance were established, the remedy for a violation is not automatic reinstatement of a teacher to his former position, and equity does not require a board to provide a windfall to petitioner in the form of salary because he performed no services for the district after the termination date. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
"The opinion does set forth that the county has regularly had a policy of accommodating people with on-the-job injuries and not off-the-job injuries and even at the trial, the county can present that position," Kelly said. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 10:01 pm
Accordingly, the court held that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and the firm is reinstated as the attorney for the petitioner in this proceeding. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:19 am
This time, the Proposed Directives have been drafted as so-called “maximum harmonisation measures”, which would preclude Member States from providing any greater or lesser protection for the matters falling within their scope. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:17 am
The §14(3) cancellation claim was also reinstated. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 1:16 pm
However, on a prior appeal, this Court reversed that order of the Family Court, thereby effectively reinstating overnight visitation. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Denying the employer’s motion to dismiss her claim for lost wages and salary incidental to the reinstatement of benefits, the district court found the employee stated a plausible claim under ERISA, Section 510, and rejected the notion that her theory of liability failed as a matter of law (Marin v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
See, Matter of Joyce v. [read post]
