Search for: "Identification Devices v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 351
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2013, 9:43 pm
Perhaps raising the felony bar resolves some of these problems, but only if the statute is also amended to ensure that the government cannot aggravate the sentence by stacking convictions from the same course of conduct, as it did in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
Orin Kerr states in part two of his comprehensive analysis of Swartz's case that Aaron's Law would not have changed the outcome. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
Orin Kerr states in part two of his comprehensive analysis of Swartz's case that Aaron's Law would not have changed the outcome. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 5:19 am
Internet access device. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Noah Kravitz), LinkedIn (Eagle v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Noah Kravitz), LinkedIn (Eagle v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 4:56 am
Stanley's residence is one unit in an apartment complex comprised of six units. . . . [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 8:51 pm
“[R]estraints imposed on government to pry into the lives of the citizen go to the essence of a democratic state” (R. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:07 am
On February 23, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge John Conroy issued a search warrant for the Residence.U.S. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
Ali is another such case:By its own terms, however, the VCPA does not apply to “[a]ny aspect of a consumer transaction which aspect is authorized under laws or regulations of this Commonwealth or the United States, or the formal advisory opinions of any regulatory body or official of this Commonwealth or the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 3:15 am
United States, 110 F.3d 780 (Fed. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:47 am
Following a trial in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Defendant prevailed. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:13 pm
When we first read Steiden v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
According to the definition provided by R 26(4), “plant variety” means any plant grouping within a single botanical taxon of the lowest known rank, which grouping, irrespective of whether the conditions for the grant of a plant variety right are fully met, can be (a) defined by the expression of the characteristics that results from a given genotype or combination of genotypes, (b) distinguished from any other plant grouping by the expression of at least one of the said characteristics,… [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:17 pm
Right now, Congress and most states have not enacted statutes to regulate how law enforcement can get access to the tracking data kept in more than 322 million smartphones and cellular phones in the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:42 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:46 am
United States (2009) ruled the exclusionary rule inapplicable. [read post]
