Search for: "Imperial v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2023, 5:58 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
The Evolution of Hong Kong’s International Positioning from Western Imperialism to Chinese Authoritarianism Walther Schücking Lecture Daniel McCarthy, Professor Bruno Simma’s Reflections on Dispute Resolution at the Peace Palace General Articles Julien Berger, The End of Intra-EU Investor-State Arbitration Henning Goeke, Moria 2.0 – Systemic Human Rights Violation and the Chance of a Pilot Decision Silvia Venier, The International Regime Governing… [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 10:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Patent debates on invention from Tsarist Russia to the Soviet Union · Karl HallPart V. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:42 pm by Eleonora Rosati
This year, the keynote speech will be delivered by Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer at the UKIPO.Starting at 2 pm and finishing with drinks and canapes from 6:15pm at Simmons’ offices in Citypoint, Moorgate, the full line up is below:14:00-14:30 – Registration14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome (Darren Meale)14:40-15:40 – Panel 1 – “When you do nothing or you can’t do anything – acquiescence and other modern challenges in trade mark… [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:48 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Having read Judge Reinhardt’s opinion in Perry v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:35 am by INFORRM
Tugendhat J referred to the guidance given by Lord Woolf on the subject in Hodgson v Imperial Tobacco [1998] EWCA Civ 224 which led to Queen’s Bench Division judges giving formal judgments setting out their reasons for decisions on interim applications. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 2:35 pm by admin
Interestingly, the SCC also contrasted this case with its decision in Imperial Oil v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:16 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
In essence, the General Court stated that Roshen failed to prove that the goods in question were actually sold and known under that mark during the Imperial or Soviet era in the Baltic States or Poland, this because the evidence relied upon by Roshen only related to Soviet Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  Article V not only imposes supermajority requirements but imposes them at two levels – Congress and state legislatures (or conventions) – both of which must be satisfied. [read post]