Search for: "In RE MARRIAGE OF HARMS v. Harms" Results 221 - 240 of 380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 4:43 am by Susan Brenner
The investigation nonetheless had a catastrophic impact on Scott, who lost his job and his marriage in the process. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:34 pm by Sandra C. Fava
In late 2005, in anticipation of an application by mom to move with the children to Massachusetts, dad filed a motion seeking a re-determination of custody based on “a substantial change in circumstances. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 2:40 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
Second, once you’re appointed guardian petition the court for authority to contest the suspect trust amendment under F.S. 744.441(k), or to reverse the harm done by re-amending the trust back to its prior provisions under F.S. 744.441(s). [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:56 am by Rick
Sometimes people think that the only way they can exercise their freedom — say, to define marriage — is to prevent others from exercising their freedom to define marriage in a different way. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In Lockyer v City & County of San Francisco, the California Supreme Court explained that the regulation of marriage in California is committed to state officials, so that the mayor of San Francisco had no authority to “take any action with regard to the process of issuing marriage licenses or registering marriage certificates. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:46 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Mitchell, 745 NE 2d 167 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 2001 What is the worst a blackmailer can really do? [read post]