Search for: "In Re: Appointment to Criminal Procedure Rules Committee"
Results 221 - 240
of 254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Appointed by President Gerald R. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 6:34 am
Newly appointed commission chairman John Bradley decided to hold the meeting in Harlingen, which makes it difficult for many interested parties in the state to attend. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
” In re Caremark International Inc. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:00 am
Maher was again ruled out. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 7:54 am
Bradley told the Texas Senate Criminal Justice Committee that the forensic science panel currently lacks a set of uniform rules and procedures, and that he doesn't want to move forward with any specific investigation without adopting them. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 4:21 am
I took away from the hearing that there's a bipartisan consensus on the committee, at least for now, that Texas needs to confront bad forensics instead of bury the problem under a mountain of bureaucracy, procedure and doublespeak. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:52 am
John Whitmire, D-Houston, chairman of the Senate Criminal Justice Committee. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
"If your client has a terrible criminal history, they're not going to cut you slack," Hunt said. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 4:40 pm
Here, for instance, are the secrecy provisions for grand juries as set out in Rule 6 of the Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure:(E) Secrecy of proceedings and disclosure. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
The appointment of Mr. [read post]
27 May 2009, 9:32 am
Apparently, he would sit down with the court reporter after the trials, which happened to be a woman he knew personally, and re-wrote what they thought was relevant from the trial hearings. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:44 am
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, how can I get a copy? [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 8:52 pm
Taking a serious note of the large scale destruction of public and private properties in the course of agitations, bandhs, hartals etc., the court initiated suo motu proceedings in May 2007 and appointed two committees, one headed by retd. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 11:43 pm
If the offender is indigent, counsel may or may not be appointed at state expense. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 8:07 am
"The proposed regulations of June 2007 were basically sound and only minor tweaks were needed," said Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, who is a strong proponent of both the fast-track procedures and states' certification. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 7:29 pm
Apparently, he would sit down with the court reporter after the trials, which happened to be a woman he knew personally, and re-wrote what they thought was relevant from the trial hearings. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO releases ‘FY2008 Performance and Accountability Report’; claims success despite backlog (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Prospector) USPTO transition team appointed (Managing Intellectual Property) (Intellectual… [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Levesque, No. 081344 A forfeiture order for $3,068,000 for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana, is vacated and remanded where: 1) 21 U.S.C. section 853 authorizes money judgments; 2) the case is remanded to give district court the opportunity to consider whether and to what extent the ruling in the recent Supreme Court case, US v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
P. 23(b)(2) requirements for certification; and 4) remand was necessary for consideration of whether the proposed damages class met the Rule 23(b)(3) requirements. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Mejia, No. 052856, 056683, 061744 Convictions for conspiracy to commit assaults with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, and discharge of a firearm during a crime of violence are vacated where: 1) the testimony of the Government expert witness violated the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment; and 2) that error was not harmless. [read post]
