Search for: "In Re: City of Fall v." Results 221 - 240 of 1,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
  Although it was accepted that there had been detailed consideration of proportionality in Burnip v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 269 (which concerned an appeal from the Upper Tribunal), it was noted that there had not been any discussion in that case as to the respective roles of the Upper Tribunal and the Court of Appeal. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
  Although it was accepted that there had been detailed consideration of proportionality in Burnip v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 269 (which concerned an appeal from the Upper Tribunal), it was noted that there had not been any discussion in that case as to the respective roles of the Upper Tribunal and the Court of Appeal. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:34 pm by Jeremy Gordon
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, states that disclosure must fall within the auspices of the Rule 6(e) exceptions. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
They’re right:  even under State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation (NFP) In Re the Adoption of E.W.; Jeremy Behan v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:54 pm
(In re Aimster Copyright Litigation (2003)). [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm by NL
Henson v Blackwood & Blackwood. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm by NL
Henson v Blackwood & Blackwood. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:31 pm
This piece of legislation was actually litigated before the Supreme Court of Canada in Nanaimo (City) v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:09 pm
The details are specific to the facts, but worth a look for re-examining any CFAs of that vintage. [read post]