Search for: "In Re: Trade and Commerce Bank"
Results 221 - 240
of 455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2020, 7:31 pm
Rogers Cable Inc (2002), 58 O.R. (3d) 299 (S.C.J.) [2] Re A Debtor (No. 2021 of 1995), [1996] 2 All E.R. 345 (Ch. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:31 pm
Rogers Cable Inc (2002), 58 O.R. (3d) 299 (S.C.J.) [2] Re A Debtor (No. 2021 of 1995), [1996] 2 All E.R. 345 (Ch. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IAM) Lost knowledge (IP Spotlight) Nobel Prize winning physicist R B Laughlin explains how IP damages innovation (Techdirt) US v China IP case before the World Trade Organisation - differing news on who won or lost (EXCESS COPYRIGHT) (Chinese Law Prof Blog) WIPO Assemblies conclude (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) Global – Trade Marks / Brands Trade mark marking strategy - R and TM… [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 9:56 am
DONATE TO EFF Like what you're reading? [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 6:43 pm
Trade Representative participated. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 10:30 am
Trade Representative to launch an investigation of China’s intellectual property and technology transfer practices under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:08 am
A violation of the dormant Commerce Clause? [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Banks “know every time you tap your card, they see you got the [train], and you go get your coffee, and you’re spending your money there,” points out Philip Benton, an analyst at tech research group Omdia and an expert on digital banking. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:59 pm
In re Premont Indep. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
Obama attorney-general pick good news for IP, says US Chamber of Commerce (IAM) ‘The future of the patent system’ features four former PTO leaders (Hal Wegner) CAFC to hear oral argument in USPTO v GSK & Tafas 5 December (Anticipate This!) [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:01 am
For financial services, U.S. privacy protections are in place under laws such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and major U.S. banks have been global leaders for cybersecurity protections. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 6:11 am
In May 2011, Rowe appeared before Senate Commerce Committee. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:27 pm
Last spring, the Club for Growth, FreedomWorks and the lobbying arm of the Heritage Foundation all lined up against the Chamber of Commerce and pressed GOP congressmen to vote to kill the Export-Import Bank, which nonetheless was reauthorized by an overwhelming margin. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
(Spicy IP) Cameroon Importers no match for Cameroon customs (Afro-IP) Canada IP licenses and bankruptcy: Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:11 am
And President Obama surprised everyone by pocket vetoing a bill that would have affected notarization and interstate commerce, and that many bloggers were very upset about, but I’m still not clear as to its actual impact. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:23 am
Second, it made the case that the Treaty of Amity, including its provisions related to commerce between Iran and the U.S., does not apply to measures essential to U.S. national security interests. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 8:28 pm
And eventually they’ll make it clear why they’re sitting. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
It accounted for about 70% of debit and prepaid transactions during the first half the year, according to the Nilson Report, a trade publication. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 7:47 pm
Section 52 of the Trade Practices Act provides:(1) A corporation shall not, in trade or commerce, engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive.(2) Nothing in the succeeding provisions of this Division shall be taken as limiting by implication the generality of subsection (1). [read post]
