Search for: "In Re Doe's Adoption"
Results 221 - 240
of 11,802
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2015, 7:22 am
The CFPB does plan to disclose 5-digit zip codes next to narratives, except were the population in the zip code contains fewer than 20,000 people. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:03 pm
F.S. 316.193, Florida’s driving under the influence statute, doesn’t expressly cite marijuana impairment nor does it establish a per se limit of the active ingredient THC in the blood or urine the way it does alcohol. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 6:46 pm
“We’re not talking about one day here. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:49 am
And the court distinguished In re Adoption of Ridenour (Ohio 1991), which held that: … R.C. 3107.15 reflects the legislature's intent to find families for children. [read post]
8 May 2008, 2:01 pm
Never before has there been a case with the potential to limit video game patents as with the In re Bilski appeal. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:47 am
This Court agrees with (and will adopt) the logic of the [DataQuill Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 3:57 pm
I believe that the rule should not have been adopted â€" and should never be. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Harvard Law School’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic (Clinic) submitted a petition on June 9 to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), urging it to adopt a labeling approach for the emerging category of cell-based meat and poultry that “does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Harvard Law School’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic (Clinic) submitted a petition on June 9 to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), urging it to adopt a labeling approach for the emerging category of cell-based meat and poultry that “does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Harvard Law School’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic (Clinic) submitted a petition on June 9 to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), urging it to adopt a labeling approach for the emerging category of cell-based meat and poultry that “does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Harvard Law School’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic (Clinic) submitted a petition on June 9 to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), urging it to adopt a labeling approach for the emerging category of cell-based meat and poultry that “does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Harvard Law School’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic (Clinic) submitted a petition on June 9 to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), urging it to adopt a labeling approach for the emerging category of cell-based meat and poultry that “does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Harvard Law School’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic (Clinic) submitted a petition on June 9 to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), urging it to adopt a labeling approach for the emerging category of cell-based meat and poultry that “does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 12:26 pm
My point is not to portray adopted parents as poor victims — we’re not, we’re tremendously lucky. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 4:02 am
And like their anti-free speech predecessors, they’re blind to the implications of these arguments. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
See In re Managed Care, 756 F.3d 1222, 1232 (11th Cir. 2014); Baden Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 6:07 pm
Perhaps one of the issues that makes this idea so complicated, however, is that Domestic Relations Law § 70 does not define what a “parent” is. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 12:20 pm
Court Rules MCPDS Not Satisfying 6th Amendment re Appointed Counsel. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
A state court does not have discretion to determine the applicability of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act or this chapter to a child custody proceeding based upon whether an Indian child is part of an existing Indian family.[21] Based upon this language, it does not appear that Iowa has or will adopt the existing Indian family doctrine. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 12:55 pm
California stands to lose a few millions dollars a year if it does not comply, state officials said. [read post]
