Search for: "In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
Trump additionally cites two OLC opinions from 1985 and 1986 to argue that the executive branch can judge the “legitimacy” of a congressional investigation. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:53 pm
In In re BankAmerica Corporation Securities Litigation (Oetting v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard oral arguments in In re Sealed Case, concerning the Department of Justice’s attempts to access Rep. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
” As a result, she noted, “[t]hese organizations are subject to a far more searching inquiry by bureaucratic decisionmakers. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:03 pm
In an expected move, Crystal Mangum will not be re-tried on the most serious arson charge that she faced. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:20 am
Also, judges are the ultimate gatekeepers of evidence, and they’re the ones who run their courtrooms. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:53 pm
U.S. courts have generally held that their hands are tied by the so-called “rule of non-inquiry,” which forbids American judges from passing judgment on foreign legal systems. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
Thus, the circuit split was framed as "a clash between two textual arguments concerning the meaning of 31 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm
Behrend, 133 U.S. 1462 (2013), Judge Koh determined that the fact that damages calculations would require individualized inquiries does not defeat certification of a Rule 23(b)(3) class. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 8:15 am
" Goldman, the amici argue, is inviting the Court to replace this fact-based inquiry with judges' and litigants' "common sense" impressions.The amici posit that class actions are a valuable enforcement tool, have a critical deterrent effect, and are critical to state funds' ability to recover when defrauded. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 7:06 am
I'm not worried about the standard because the decision is really ridiculous and the mistakes are not going to be hard to show to the judges. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
In re Vitamin Shoppe Procurement Services, Inc., Serial Nos. 86905555, 86905614, 86905620, 86905628 (October 4, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Deputy Chief Judge Mark A. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
This was a proposal made by the Media Regulation Roundtable in its evidence to the Inquiry [pdf]. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:43 pm
See In re Magnum Oil Tools Int’l, Ltd., 829 F.3d 1364, 1373 (Fed. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 9:50 am
We welcome your comments and inquiries. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
" Wall repudiates the suggestion that the “bona fide” prong of the standard opens the door to a purpose inquiry. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 1:14 pm
"[B]iases and motivations to lie" constitute a mighty broad "area of inquiry"; I wonder how often a judge ever forecloses cross-examination of it. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:44 am
" The SEC Plans to Re-Establish The Investment Advisory Committee. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
In the 1975 Ontario judgment Re Brown, (1975), 9 O.R. (2d) 185 at 192 (Ont. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:28 am
Judge Neomi Rao dissented. [read post]
