Search for: "In Re Interest of Br" Results 221 - 240 of 290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2010, 2:00 am by Guest Blogger
Randall Hull, The Br@nd Ranch® [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
As the Federal Circuit succinctly stated: ''Intellectual property rights do not confer a privilege to violate the antitrust laws.'' In re Indep. [read post]
Weight was also placed on the US authority of In re British American Insurance Company Limited (425 BR 844 (SD Florida, 2010) which held that “operations” and “economic activity” amounted to “more than mere incorporation and record keeping”. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:37 pm by Zachary Spilman
Appellant’s Br. at 3 CAAF, in its opinion last week, easily cleared the bar. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 8:25 pm
" In re Wands, 858 F.2d 731, 737 (Fed. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
”[6] The court’s stated standard is much less interesting than its reasoning process, which goes 2020. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto:  “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
9 May 2008, 11:30 am
”In re McCormick Road Associates, 127 B.R. at 413 (quoting In re Phoenix Piccadilly Ltd., 849 F.2d 1393, 1394 (11th Cir.1988) (emphasis added); see also id. at 415 (“[O]nce a court has properly found that the debtor has failed to satisfy the court's objective good faith inquiry-i.e., whether reorganization is the proper course of action in a particular debtor's case-it may properly dismiss the debtor's petition without considering the… [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm by Gideon
King’s approach to life and his likely frowning upon my taking joy in the misery of others, I’ll give you the first link of this edition of BR before I get to Dr. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm
" Appellants' Br. 36. [read post]