Search for: "In Re Memorandum Opinions"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,075
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2020, 7:23 am
We'll start with the memorandum opinion. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 10:26 pm
If President Trump wins re-election, then Secretary Wolf will likely make his interim policy permanent. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
” Just yesterday, DHS announced that it would reassess the future of the DACA program, including re-rescinding the program. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
The memorandum does not explain how to identify census responses by undocumented immigrants. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:18 am
The census itself won’t calculate those numbers because (as most readers know) the Census Bureau won’t even ask respondents whether they are citizens, let alone whether they’re undocumented immigrants. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
’s going-private acquisition of HomeFed Corporation because Jeffries negotiated the support of a key HomeFed investor before implementing the shareholder protections of the seminal MFW decision in In Re HomeFed Corporation Stockholder Litigation, No. 2010-0592-AGB memorandum opinion issued (Del. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 7:55 pm
Derivative Litig., No. 2017-0337-SG memorandum opinion (Del. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:09 am
In a 94-page opinion issued last Thursday, Vice Chancellor Laster denied defendants’ motion to dismiss in In re Dell Technologies Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 8:07 am
"] From Judge Gary Sharpe's opinion today in Soos v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 1:59 pm
By contrast, the CFPB is acting voluntarily and of its own initiative to re-examine the mandatory underwriting provisions from an evidentiary and policy standpoint. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Whatever “DACA” means, there are two, independently significant policy effects of the DACA Memorandum (and hence also of rescinding it). [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:27 am
” What is your opinion about the draft bill and the German intention to re-ratify the UPCA as soon as possible? [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 7:55 am
by Dennis Crouch In re Apple (Fed. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
By Michael Douglas and Mhairi Stewart Andrew Bell is a leader of private international law in Australia. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
The consumer plaintiff’s April 24, 2020 Motion to Compel Production of the Mandiant Report can be found here; Capital One’s May 6, 2020, Opposition can be found here; Capital One’s May 12, 2020, Reply to the plaintiff’s opposition can be found here; the May 15, 2020 transcript of the hearing can be found here; and Judge Anderson’s May 26, 2020, Memorandum Opinion and Order can be found here. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm
Once again, a meta-analysis is advanced as a basis for an expert witness’s causation opinion, and once again, the opinion is the subject of a Rule 702 challenge. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 9:52 am
This quotation is from an unpublished OLC opinion, “Memorandum for Neil Eggleston, Associate Counsel to the President, from Walter Dellinger, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, Re: Appointment of an Acting Staff Director of the United States Commission on Civil Rights at 3 (Jan. 13, 1994),” and is quoted and explained on page 164 of this 1996 OLC opinion on “The Constitutional Separation of Powers Between the President and… [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
GAF’s complaint understandably focused heavily on defendant’s Baron & Budd’s memorandum, entitled “Preparing for Your Deposition. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
For more information see:https://www.northbaybusinessjournal.com/opinion/10808196-181/opinion-california-storm-water-permit-lawhttps://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/sb_205_business_license_requirements.html 2. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
”[11] Clearly, such questions can undermine the admissibility of an expert witness’s opinion under Rule 702, and courts need to say why they have found the challenged opinion to have had a “sufficient basis. [read post]
