Search for: "In Re Nielsen"
Results 221 - 240
of 432
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2013, 8:42 am
(according to Nielsen), 20,000 represents less than two-hundredths of one percent of those households. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 11:21 am
— John Scalzi (@scalzi) September 13, 2013 And who decides you’re being an asshole? [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:10 pm
In Re American Express Merchants’ Litigation, 667 F.3d 204 at 219 (2d Cir. 2012). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
In re. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:20 am
However, in order to prevent the losing party to an arbitration dispute from essentially requesting the court to re-try the case, the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) provides very narrow grounds for vacatur of an arbitration award. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:20 am
Yes, you’re paying a third party for the convenience, but that convenience is not offered by the network anyway, so you’re not depriving it—or anyone—of revenue. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 3:57 pm
The company relied upon the Supreme Court’s decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:16 am
” In Re American Express Merchants’ Litigation, 667 F.3d 204 at 219 (2d Cir. 2012). [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
The Second Circuit's opinion in In re American Express III 667 F.3d 204 (2d Cir. 2012) is here. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
Today’s argument was not the first time the Supreme Court had this case before it, having sent it back for reconsideration after an important class arbitration decision in 2010 - in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
The Amex appeal re-canvasses much the same arguments as in Concepcion, only the context of purported enforcement of federal antitrust statutes (rather than state law claims). [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:29 pm
The movie was a fictional work about two retired dancers. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 4:39 am
See In re Mouttet, 686 F.3d 1322, 1333-1334 (Fed. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 4:39 am
See In re Mouttet, 686 F.3d 1322, 1333-1334 (Fed. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 10:05 pm
Simply click here, provide a name and email address, vote in the Legal Technology category, and then you're done. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 7:36 pm
Of course, this case may vanish for years when it gets sucked up into the California Supreme Court's Gentry re-examination. [read post]
Supreme Court to Address Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements and Class Action Waivers Yet Again
19 Nov 2012, 5:22 am
Ct. 1740 (2011) (holding that a class action waiver in an arbitration agreement was enforceable because the FAA preempts state law); Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 7:32 pm
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Stolt-Nielsen SA v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 2:32 pm
Citing to Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
