Search for: "In Re US Lines, Inc." Results 221 - 240 of 3,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
” The court also instructed the parties that “[m]aking an adverse claim to a line item of property is not contemplated in year’s support. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 1:15 pm by Tom Lamb
Some of the Mirena lawsuits against Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., have been filed in the federal court Mirena MDL -- In Re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, Multidistrict Litigation No. 2434, United States District Court, Southern District of New York, with Judge Cathy Seibel presiding -- which was commenced by means of an April 8, 2013 Transfer Order. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:19 am by Dan Hepburn
Top Line Industries Inc., 1995 BCCA 2305 (“Top Line”) resulted in the enactment of section 73.1, which modified the effect of section 73. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:18 am
"]  May 17 2023 - 11 AM [Virtual]: In re Panini America, Inc. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:23 am
June 4, 2019 - 1 PM: In re Christine Schiefer, Serial No. 87737157 [Refusal to register the mark shown immediately below, for "On-line retail store featuring apparel, glassware, stoneware and accessory items for the consumption of alcoholic beverages," on the ground that applicant's specimens of use fail to show the applied-for mark used as a service mark for the recited services]. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 7:34 am by Andrew Delaney
The SCOV got several amici briefs from the Vermont Department of Health, the Defender General, and the Vermont Council on Development and Mental Health Services, Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 12:00 pm
With a little more effort, you could find those closed cases, too, and we'll probably pursue that avenue off-line. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 3:35 am by John L. Welch
[i.e., the portions shown in solid lines in the drawings].Examining Attorney Douglas M. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:43 am
But if you do, will you drop me a line to let me know it was useful? [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Baker Hughes, Inc., 215 F.3d 1297, 1301 (Fed. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:43 pm by Gary Burger
Without further ado, our first winner is Gavin Ince! [read post]