Search for: "In re: Thurgood"
Results 221 - 240
of 274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2017, 9:43 am
Whether I wish these things or not, they’re going to happen. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 9:00 pm
And it's cool for us, because we're legal geeks. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
They're very different from the barriers faced by earlier generations. [read post]
9 May 2010, 10:00 pm
We're talking about a Supreme Court justice. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Each may be re-elected indefinitely. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:29 am
A lawyer or pro se litigant who is scheduled to argue and wishes to do so in person may appear at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am
Rejecting stare decisis when previous decisions conflict with the Constitution does not mean rejecting res judicata. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
Zimring, 566 P.2d 725 (Haw. 1977); In re Banning, 832 P.2d 724 (Haw. 1992). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm
This is what happened.ELENA KAGAN: You know, I respect and indeed I revere the military.But I also felt a need to protect our -- to defend our school's very long-standing anti-discrimination policy and to protect the men and women, the students, who were meant to be protected by that policy: the gay and lesbian students who wanted to serve in the military and do that most honorable kind of service.KWAME HOLMAN: Kagan also sparred at length with Arizona Republican Jon Kyl over her past praise of… [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
Eight percent named Thurgood Marshall as the chief justice (and I certainly wish he was, even though he's been dead for 18 years). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:14 am
"An epistolary exploration for a Thurgood Marshall biography. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Johnson also nominated Thurgood Marshall, a prominent civil rights lawyer for the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, to the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Thurgood Marshall, making the same point Stevens did about Booth and Payne, put it more bluntly. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Rhode’s credentials (they’re impressive), I could not resist reading what she had to say about a subject that has long been of interest to me. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:34 am
As a result, they're accountable to no one. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
John Hope Franklin, whose legacy Arcidiacono treads upon, provided research for Thurgood Marshall in the Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Of course, Supreme Court appointments are mired in politics, but in a country with extraordinary religious diversity, this configuration demands explanation.The 1981 Court: 3 Episcopalians, 2 Presbyterians, and one Catholic, Lutheran, Methodist, and ProtestantWhen Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who is Episcopalian, joined the Court in 1981, there were two other Episcopalians (Justices Thurgood Marshall and Byron White), two Presbyterians (Chief Justice Warren Burger and Justice Lewis… [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
That list, he added, is basically closed, and the Court would not re-open it to include animal cruelty. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
For example, if the other eight Justices are all in agreement, she might rethink (and re-rethink) her dissenting vote. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
ShareThere is no man in this country to whom the colored race is more indebted. [read post]
