Search for: "In re: Watkins" Results 221 - 240 of 718
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2023, 9:04 pm by Coral Beach
“Part of our messaging in this health alert is that we want healthcare professionals to be aware that if you try to make a guess about which antibiotic is going to work for Shigella, the odds are really increasing that you’re going to guess wrong,” Watkins said. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:15 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
You can train people all you want, but you’re dealing with human beings. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:02 pm by Steve Hall
We're under no illusion voters will automatically just end the death penalty. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:46 am by Julie Lam
  In re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding Constitutionality of 2011 PA 38, No. 143157. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 11:20 am
He didn't specify which office he'll be based out of, but we're assuming D.C. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 7:49 pm by Carolyn Elefant
If you’re an aficionado of legal jargon (and come on, aren’t all of us lawyers, at least when we’ve had too much to drink?) [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 7:23 am
In In re Watkins (No. 06-0653), the Court denied mandamus relief from an order granting the plaintiff a 30-day extension of time for filing an expert report under CPRC § 74.351(a). [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:04 pm by Jim Chen
James Watkins, Winter Sunday, Venus Setting (2009)Gin Blossoms, Pieces of the Night , New Miserable Experience (1992)Is it any wonder that the stars just don't rush byWhen you're only doing 60 through this oh-so-vacant nightBut it's lacking something big this timeWhat the hell did you expect to findAphrodite on a barstool by your sideTwelfth night we goAfter something everyone should knowSomewhere in the distance out of sight . [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:26 am
Irell and Kirkland Hit $145K Mark [The Recorder via Law.com] Re: Kirkland goes to $145k in LA/SF [Infirmation / Greedy LA] Earlier: Skaddenfreude: Kirkland LA Ups the Ante [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 7:23 am
In In re Watkins (No. 06-0653), the Court denied mandamus relief from an order granting the plaintiff a 30-day extension of time for filing an expert report under CPRC § 74.351(a). [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm by law shucks
If you’re in NY you can be in Boston in a couple of billable hours (Acela FTW). [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 12:02 pm
Debevoise & Plimpton; Weil, Gotshal; Munger, Tolles; Latham & Watkins and Patterson, Belknap. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by SHG
Sam Fishman  was a lawyer with Latham & Watkins, who threw in a little for himself when billing for his firm. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:29 am by Above the Law
An associate recommends working for Goldsmith, a litigation partner and co-chair of Gibson Dunn’s Securities Enforcement Practice Group, because “[i]f you’re good, you basically get to be a mini-me — all the cool stuff he does, you do. [read post]