Search for: "In re Austin B."
Results 221 - 240
of 553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am
But in a consolidated ruling in a pair of lawsuits filed in federal court in Austin (one by the federal government; one by private immigration groups), a district judge on Thursday, February 29 issued a preliminary injunction barring SB4 from going into effect—concluding that SB4 is clearly preempted by federal law under Arizona , and not giving much stock to the constitutional self-defense claim. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Above the Law posts some analysis of the strategy behind the newly re-filed opposition to the nickname of the Washington Redskins. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 7:12 pm
In re Planned Parenthood Fedn. of Am., Inc., 52 F.4th 625 (5th Cir. 2022). [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:29 am
Nimock and Brad Sears of the UCLA Williams Institute.05/28/09 Reality Check Live with Mike Monokian, discussion of the ruling by ADF attorney Austin R. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Consumer is less a delimiter in US scholarship than the licensor of expansion, b/c consumer perception is malleable when you have good counsel. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Phillips (Sidley Austin) ] at p. 40:Generally, when reexamination occurs, one recent article states that nearly 74% of the time finds the patent invalid or restricts its claims. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 11:14 am
They’re going to go out and have fun and party, and unfortunately, we’re going to see increases in crime. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
Austin (In re Austin), 271 B.R. 97 (Bankr. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:05 am
Mazzeo, Associate Professor, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University - Jonathan Hillel, J.D., Northwestern University School of Law (2009) - Samantha Zyontz, Senior Research Associate, Searle Civil Justice Institute, George Mason University School of Law Willful Patent Infringement and Enhanced Damages after In Re Seagate: An Empirical Study - Christopher B. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:32 pm
b) Suspension based on a test failure: The issues are slightly different if the subject submits to and fails chemical testing. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:29 am
(h/t: austin defender via grits) [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 12:30 pm
Johnson’s library in Austin, Texas about the sanctity of voting rights in America. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:14 am
In re The John G. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 5:34 am
Timothy B. [read post]
1 May 2008, 10:41 pm
Quick sidetrack: the purpose of phrasing it that way was (a) deliberately confrontational and (b) meant to make them feel uncomfortable. [read post]
The SEC and Small Capital Formation: The Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies (Part 1)
17 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Greene, CFO, Tandy Leather Factory, Fort Worth, Texas Kara B. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 7:28 pm
If Company does not do so, this agreement shall terminate at the end of that thirty‑day (30) period (or at such earlier time which Company may designate by notice to you), and you shall be deemed to have fulfilled all of your obligations under this agreement except those obligations which survive the termination of this agreement (such as warranties, re‑recording restrictions and obligation to pay royalties. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
-Austin 2010, pet. denied). [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:12 am
And so today we've actually moved our organizational home from its original location in Charlotte, North Carolina to here in Austin. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
-Austin Sept. 1, 2016, no pet. h.) [read post]
