Search for: "In re P. I. (1989)"
Results 221 - 240
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)* * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
I-Flow Corp., 2011 WL 1361562, at *2, 3-4 (D. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
According to Section 8(1)(i) of the RTI Act, Cabinet papers including the deliberations of the Council of Ministers and Secretaries and other officers are exempt from disclosure. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 9:56 am
The new Brooklyn district attorney Kenneth P. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Under the terms of §157(b)(2)(C), the bankruptcy court had statutory authority to enter Final Rulings on the Smith counterclaim to the Pierce Proof of Claim.The bankruptcy court could also enter Final Rulings on the Pierce Proof of Claim because: (i) although Pierce claimed that the Pierce Proof of Claim involved a “personal injury tort” which the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to hear under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 12:20 pm
App. 36, 40 (1989). [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 412 (1989) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Supp. 26, 29-30 (N.D.N.Y. 1989) (“[p]lacing every potential warning or use requirement onto the label could operate to dilute the most important instructions”), aff’d, 874 F.2d 115 (2d Cir. 1989).Overwarning has also been the subject of a fair amount of scholarly treatment. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm
A lot has happened since Monday night, when I posted a blog on the case which we now know as Re P (A Child). [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
In re Schering Plo [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
See infra p. 6. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I thought I’d pass along two briefs that the UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic has filed in the last few weeks. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
Theory and statutory interpretation --Philip P. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
The learned intermediary rule could be Bob Dylan (I know, we’re showing our age, here). [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 8:09 am
[i] http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx? [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 5:51 am
In In re Piazza, 719, F.3d 1253, 2013 U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
I had to grieve first. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
” Recommendation at 3, citing In re New York Renu with Moistureloc Prod. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Med. 997 (1989); Troyen A. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:49 am
I also wish to request a B-2 visa for my wife and 2 children, who will accompany me in this trip to the United States." [read post]
