Search for: "In re S. W. (1978)"
Results 221 - 240
of 269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
”); In re Comiskey, 554 F.3d 967, 973 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
’s wishes.21. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
It can also be understood as shared perceptions of the meaning of reality backed by massive background consensus (Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms (William Rehg (trans) MIT Press, 1996); pp. 22, 322); or as biopolitics (the narratives through which social and political power may be normalized over the control and management of the bodies of the living and their relationship to physical and abstract objects and the technologies of control) (Michel Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics:… [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 5:24 am
Prugh, James W. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 8:38 am
An objection must be made and a post-trial motion regarding that motion must be filed for an appellate court to review that objection…otherwise you’re stuck with the evidence and/or the judge’s ruling on the objection. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
(Christian Shepherd, "Looking to the Future: Xi Shuts the Door on the Past," The Washington Post (7 November 2021)("Only two previous leaders of China have previously adjudicated on party history: Mao Zedong, the founder of the People's Republic, and Deng Xiaoping, the strongman leader who unleashed market reforms in 1978. [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:20 am
If you thought this one up, you're a creative genius. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
& W. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Selikoff’s mother, Tillie, died. 1946-02. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
In re Askin, 47 F.3d 100 (U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Does it violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment? [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Ragsdale, United Student Aid Funds, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, Charles W. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
App. 1978); Payne v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
Interviewer: [Y]ou’re saying there’s statutes on the books now[?] [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
This argument relied on Justice White’s argument, in concurrence, that when people are exercising judgment with respect to a particular client, they’re “engaging in the practice of a profession” and the speech is “incidental to the conduct of the profession. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am
” Id.; see also In re S.M.S., 196 N.C. [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:58 am
Other regulatory reports in England & Wales in this period (Ormrod, Benson, Marr, Wood) barely acknowledged the idea of legal edtech, let alone explored it.1 The Legal Education & Training Review (LETR) was the first report to comment extensively on legal edtech in E+W. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
In fact, Bruen's focus on text as elucidated by legal history is nothing new in Second Amendment litigation. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
COUNSEL: Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Dennis W. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Thus “[w]e do not believe comment k was intended to provide nor should it provide all ethical drugs with blanket immunity from strict liability design defect claims. [read post]
