Search for: "In re William F." Results 221 - 240 of 1,549
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2021, 11:04 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction Evaluating the Federal R&D ax Credit Effectiveness of the R&D Tax Credit — Does the R&D Credit Increase R&D Spending? [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 4:34 am
Cir. 1992); In re Box Solutions Corp., 79 USPQ2d 1953, 1955 (TTAB 2006); In re Finisar Corp., 78 USPQ2d 1618, 1621 (TTAB 2006). [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Some notes on vexing issue, which fortunately has never serious issue for me. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
Chien Professor of Law Santa Clara University School of Law Thomas F. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Laws of the Constitution: Consolidated Author: Donald F. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:36 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Melanne Verveer, executive director of the Georgetown Institute for Women, Peace and Security, and CSIS expert Daniel F. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm by Francis Pileggi
This is the 16th year that Francis Pileggi has published an annual list of key corporate and commercial decisions of the Delaware Supreme Court and the Delaware Court of Chancery. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:29 pm by Tia Sewell
CSIS expert Daniel F. [read post]
For more information see: http://www.caiso.com/Documents/ISOAdoptsNewPolicies-AccommodateBatteryStorageResources-ImproveReliability-Fall2021.pdf F. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 6:50 pm
  We live, as the Chinese I Ching suggests, in the age of the taming power of the small (Hexagram 9); or as the African Ifa suggests, in an age in which all are devoured in the city of witches (A dífá fún Ologbo Ojigolo nsawo re ilu àjé (Ôwonrínmeji No. 6). [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 3:48 am by SHG
Identify the problem if you’re serious about fixing it. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
For example, the rules prohibit a lawyer from “attempting to deceive a tribunal” by “offering false evidence” (R 5.1-2(e)), and from knowingly misstating the “contents of a document” or “testimony of a witness” (R 5.1-2(f)). [read post]