Search for: "In the Interest of PS"
Results 221 - 240
of 612
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
See Department of Justice Order 1200.1, Chapter 4-1, B.7.j, found at http://www.justice.gov/jmd/ps/chpt4-1.html (last accessed on March 30, 2012). [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 11:49 am
PS. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 3:19 pm
PS. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
PS — As a new course, the series starts out on sale … :-) Send to Kindle [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
Friedman PS: I am an adjunct Professor of Law at Fordham Law School, where I have taught a course on arbitration for 17 years. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 4:56 pm
” Lots of interesting stuff here about drone courts, the pros and cons of a new AUMF, and the like. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
There was a further meeting in May where a solution was sought in collaboration with Seondo, because the [opponent] was very much interested in concluding a deal. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 10:29 pm
For those interested, here is my written submission to Natco's baseless allegations. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:06 am
PS: As of “press” time here on the VMO, rumor of any domestic airlines introducing social seating is unconfirmed. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:06 am
This presents interesting legal issues as to when such evidence will be admissible, despite the way in which it was obtained.The High Court gave a recent judgment in the family law case P v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:41 pm
PS: In the interest of full inclusion, cat lovers, your sign would say, “Purr more; Hiss less. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:47 am
John PS is currently seeking highly qualified candidates for a position that ultimately leads to ownership. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
And settle it did, when Brazil raised a similar war cry some years ago...ps: Thanks to Malavika Jayaram for pointing me to this hilarious image. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:45 am
This defence incorporates many of the arguments advanced by Prashant in his posts here and here. ps: Each time I comment on a pharma patent issue, I get hit with the question: Which side are you on? [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 7:41 am
It is here and if you scroll down – below Best, as always Charon PS.. and remember… a duck texted me to say that they, too, are bipedal and asked if I could fly! [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 7:41 am
It is here and if you scroll down – below Best, as always Charon PS.. and remember… a duck texted me to say that they, too, are bipedal and asked if I could fly! [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 9:38 am
It all comes down to whether the FDA's ban on truthful speech is a legitimate way, under the First Amendment, to pursue those interests. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 2:27 pm
Comment In legal terms, this case is now probably of academic interest only, since section 71 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 fills the gap which the Court held had existed in UK law before then. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:47 am
And speaking of elections, here are a few other interesting outcomes: The U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 3:45 am
You can read testimonials from former clients on our website and wanted to mention a few new ones that might interest you. [read post]
