Search for: "John Finder"
Results 221 - 240
of 357
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
"There's no finders-keepers in the art world," says Lowenberg, a Texas Rising Stars honoree every year since 2006, who handled the case pro bono because of Herring's friendship with the late John O'Quinn. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 3:04 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:16 am
Colores's testimony, she sought to elicit testimony from John Gangl, her stepfather. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm
John S. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:22 pm
John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 U. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:27 pm
Attorney John L. [read post]
20 May 2011, 6:07 am
Barber, through the testimony of Sergeant John Cook, the lead investigator in the case. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:00 am
According to the Hollywood Reporter:Fox is offering such fare as the spinoff "The Finder," (derived from the hit "Bones") from 20th Century Fox TV, and J. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:43 am
” John Adams, 1774 [2] As an aside, I have to put in a plug for a wonderful documentary film produced and directed by my friend Susan Saladoff, a lawyer in Oregon. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
Allen, John Henry Wigmore Professor of Law at Northwestern University, in Chicago, Illinois. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:04 am
The subject is not beyond the common understanding of the fact-finder and therefore will not assist the fact-finder – Rule 702. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 7:16 pm
While he claimed his signature on the agreement was a forgery, the court said that no rational fact finder could accept his claim. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:36 pm
However, it makes no assumptions that the fresh evidence will necessarily put the fact-finder in a stronger epistemic position. [read post]
A "Noah's Ark of Scholars" Discusses Strategies for Increasing Public Engagement with the Government
31 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Gurin cited the “finder” program on Healthcare.gov, which reviews public and private health insurance options, including each option’s price and surcharges. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:30 pm
Normally, a reviewing court accepts the findings of fact of the fact-finders in the trial court unless there is “no substantial evidence” to support those findings. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:29 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966). [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Johns Manville Corp., slip op. at 3, Phila. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 4:38 am
Second, while some evidence suggests that pseudonym filings make fact-finders wonder what would cause the plaintiff to hide his or her identity, judges can head this off at the pass by issuing clear jury instructions that the "John Doe" or "Jane Doe" filing means nothing with respect to the credibility of the defendant or his witnesses. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:59 pm
Second, while some evidence suggests that pseudonym filings make fact-finders wonder what would cause the plaintiff to hide his or her identity, judges can head this off at the pass by issuing clear jury instructions that the "John Doe" or "Jane Doe" filing means nothing with respect to the credibility of the defendant or his witnesses. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:28 pm
For instance, the judge writes,Under this statute the finders of fact and surrogates, in ascertaining the Catholic’s beliefs as applicable to a particular medical condition, may encounter, and should be alerted to, various groups or persons improperly contesting the authority of the Magisterium, or the Catholic Church’s official position or its doctrines, and claiming a right to declare principles in opposition to or inconsistent therewith:[UPDATE: Paragraph added.] [read post]
