Search for: "Johnson v. Action Target" Results 221 - 240 of 454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2016, 12:14 pm by Ad Law Defense
Aug. 23, 2016), the Plaintiff sued Target with a proposed class action alleging the retailer’s up & up Green Aloe Vera Gel lacks traces of Aloe Vera. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:19 pm by Michael Grossman
In essence, Statute of Limitations is the amount of time a plaintiff has to seek damages for injuries caused by a defendant’s action (or failure to act). [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
We are loath to give the government the power to punish us for our thoughts and not our actions. [read post]
20 Aug 2016, 1:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court found that questions of fact common to the class predominated over individual inquiries (Hutson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am by Bill Marler
With a Salmonella Outbreak raging, might be a good time to ask that question – again. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:59 pm by Ad Law Defense
Johnson We’ve blogged in the past about the raft of consumer class actions hitting beer and spirits makers – particularly lawsuits targeting manufacturers with claims that terms such as “handcrafted” or “handmade” are misleading if used by companies employing typical mass-production methods. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:41 pm by Ad Law Defense
** A Return to the Limits of In Re Tobacco II? [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
Both the Jones and Beckles petitions urge prompt action because the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s one-year bar on Johnson claims runs . . . well, technically, yesterday. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
It asks: (1) whether Johnson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
As for the residuum of last week’s relists, they’re all back for more action. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In this guest post, Stephen O’Donnell of the Steptoe & Johnson law firm takes a look at two particular standard features of the cyber liability insurance policies, the retroactive date and policy inception date exclusions, and the potential for these exclusions to preclude coverage for the very kind of exposures that are the reasons most purchasers buy the insurance. [read post]