Search for: "Johnson v. Hamilton" Results 221 - 240 of 281
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985) requires that property owners initially file their regulatory takings claims in state court, and the Leones did so, asserting the regulations permitted no economically beneficial use of their land. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:01 pm by Steve Bainbridge
no7) Lyndon Johnson (14)--ditto5) Benedict Arnold (17)--too low5) Woodrow Wilson (17)--huh? [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
His medical training included a year as Chief Resident and a Fellowship in the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 8:04 pm
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172, 191 (1985), as soon as the government makes a final decision applying the regulation to the plaintiff's property, and the property owner is not required to seek a change in the law before it can come to court. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:40 am
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), and whether in order to ripen a takings claim, a property owner is obligated to seek a legislative change to the regulations applicable to the property. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 10:30 am
”  On the other hand, as the Indiana Court of Appeals concluded in Johnson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 8:44 am
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), the decision that gave us the weird ripeness rules in regulatory takings. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 10:21 am
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), the decision that gave us the weird ripeness rules in regulatory takings. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am by Roshonda Scipio
TITLE Samuel Johnson : the struggle / Jeffrey Meyers. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:01 am
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985) for the proposition that "any objection to the taking, or deficiency in adequate compensation, could be and preferably is to be done in state proceedings. [read post]