Search for: "Keene v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, was “something of an anticlimax. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Those cases continue to be on keen ice as the records trickle in. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:13 am by Amy Howe
” An op-ed in The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) urges the Court to grant review in Spokeo v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am by INFORRM
” Lord Sumption distinguished the facts of Mr Catt’s appeal from those in MM v United Kingdom, and the decision of the Supreme Court in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, in that: “[t]here has been no disclosure to third parties, and the prospect of future disclosure is limited by comprehensive restrictions. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:17 pm by Eva Galperin and Nate Cardozo
Our Ethiopia case is an example of a country deciding not to play by the rules, unleashing the Ethiopian national security apparatus on a dissident living in the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
”   Such language, it added, is absolutely essential, under the Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
United States, it upheld the conviction of a fleeing bank robber who broke into an elderly woman’s home and instructed her to go with him to her computer room – four to nine feet away – so that police would not see him. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 12:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
And while Jefferson continued to insist, even when retired, that the federal and state governments represented two independent and equal sovereigns, Marshall, in McCulloch v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
Lisa Keen of the Keen News Services reviews the state of play for challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage, as well as how the Court might rule on those challenges. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm by Giles Peaker
In the Secretary of State’s view, qualification criteria form part of an allocation scheme. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Michael Knapp shared news that defendants in United States v. [read post]