Search for: "King v. Waters" Results 221 - 240 of 487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
  So we decided to take an in-depth look at all of the the precedent that rejects application of a “fraud on the market” reliance presumption to state-law claims.Just to make sure that everyone’s with us, briefly “fraud on the market” is a doctrine that waters down fraud (and, plaintiffs would like to say, other liability theories based on claimed misinformation) by presuming reliance in certain limited circumstances. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 7:16 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
Wearn, 2005 NY Slip Op 51236U, 4, 8 Misc. 3d 1022A, 803 N.Y.S.2d 21 (Kings County Civ. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:53 am by Nathan Dorn
London: Bradbury and Evans, 1854-1872, 25 v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:51 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The question before the Court is whether the “arise out of or relate to” requirement for a state court to exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant under Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am by Jordan Brunner
  Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Its title is the Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
El Dorado County Water Agency (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 931, 962-965 [NOE filed for resolution authorizing agency to negotiate to purchase a water project preceded by 5 months agency’s project “approval” through taking actual steps to purchase]; Coalition for Clean Air v. [read post]
Jackson ruled that Guam could pursue a cost-recovery claim against the U.S., holding that an earlier consent decree addressing violations of the Clean Water Act at the landfill did not resolve Guam’s liability, and that it therefore did not trigger a contribution claim. [read post]