Search for: "LEE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 221 - 240 of 264
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (2007) (see denial of rehearing en banc). [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:24 am by Anna Christensen
  At the Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh looks back at a footnote in the Court’s 2008 ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am by James Bickford
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm by David Kopel
Indeed, the individual right arguments were so strong that when the Supreme Court finally got around to announcing a new Second Amendment decision, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 6:44 pm
Lee Estate (1993), 50 E.T.R 297:[41] In Lee v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Stay pending reexam denied because a stay would result in ‘more significant’ prejudice given the Court’s overall speed in disposing patent cases: Telecommunication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Report and Blog)   Global - Patents New exchange, Intellectual Property Exchange International, can be a game-changer, but will need good patents to thrive (IAM) (Technology Transfer Tactics)   Australia Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute: Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (Managing IP) (ipwars)   Belgium Belgian Supreme Court prohibits fishing expeditions: Ineos Manufacturing Belgium NV and Ineos… [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:56 am
UPDATE: In the comments thread, Lee Liberman Otis offers an alternative (and very likely) reason for the Court’s unusual September argument: section 403(a)(4) of BCRA, which provides that “[i]t shall be the duty of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the Supreme Court of the United States to advance on the docket and to expedite to the greatest possible extent the disposition of [an] action and… [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
That's three.And, perhaps reflecting its federal roots, the highest court in the District of Columbia has applied Twombly/Iqbal pleading standards several times, in Murray v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 3:26 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated a sanction against DC employee rights attorney John Karl, and held that attorneys are free to make arguments based on inferences. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:06 am
  A federal appeals court in New York and the District of Columbia’s highest local court rejected the constitutional complaints. [read post]