Search for: "LITTLE v STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,640
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am
Nobody really wants the system further swamped with applications if there is an easier (but also lawful) way of resolving these issues. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:09 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 5:10 am
And in that meeting — I’ve already described the text, structure, history conversation. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 1:51 am
It could still try to do that at the operating system level, but that would become a privacy issue.There are politicians who believe a breakup of certain Big Techs is needed. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Even if one acknowledges that many initiatives and referenda will strike one as ill-advised, one must compare those results with the output of the existing polity and its structures, both in terms of bad laws passed and good laws blocked. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 3:55 am
In terms of the impact of the progressivity of the tax system, Gentry and Hubbard found that for every percentage point decrease in their measure of tax structure convexity, the probability of moving to a better job increased by 0.277 percentage points. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Board overruled Plessy v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
(This was written before D.C. v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am
David Scupp: Ellen, it would be great if you could tell the listeners a little bit more about your background, including your background in college athletics and what your work in academics is focused on. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:29 pm
In Lehman v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
For example, my amicus brief in Espinoza v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 12:10 pm
Jarkesy, Jr., et al. v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 6:09 pm
Tyson (1842) and Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 11:30 am
A recent invocation of this faulty logic occurred in Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s questions during the November 2021 oral arguments in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 10:00 am
Roberts In the Dobbs v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:22 pm
Good for everyone -- the defendant, the system (and taxpayers), and even the plaintiff. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm
J. 363, 368 (2021). [8] Neiman Marcus v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:45 am
Oklahoma v. [read post]
