Search for: "Large v. Superior Court"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2009, 7:08 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York decided recently Fensterstock v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 2:39 pm
In Hampton v Nesbit(A08A1887) the court of appeals held that the Judge Merck, DeKalb Superior Court, abused its discretion in ordering a delay in the upward modification of child support until such time as the past due child support payments have been made. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:22 am
City of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
In Fulton County Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:26 am
The Court of Appeals ruling yesterday in Hendricks County Board of Commissioners v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm
The Court found instructive San Francisco Tomorrow v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 11:58 am
Superior Court (2009) 46 Cal.4th 969, 978.) [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:13 am
Patino, RI: Superior Court 2012 no. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:40 am
Georgia Gwinnett County Superior Court Judge Tracie Cason's decision last week in Walters v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Regards, Roy] Walmart v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 3:44 pm
A recent Delaware decision adds to the large body of Delaware jurisprudence on this topic. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Dred Scott, The Civil Rights Cases, Lochner, Reynolds v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:14 am
When the California Supreme Court issued its ruling on Property Reserve v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 7:11 am
National Union, the Delaware Superior Court explained that Stillwater had seized upon the Court’s 2019 opinion in Solera Holdings v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm
Hailey Andrews and AndrewsAG, Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm
Hailey Andrews and AndrewsAG, Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm
February 25, 2014 In an interesting and important decision issued by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on February 21st, the Court has now imposed a $500,000 civil administrative monetary penalty (“AMP”) against Rogers for failing to have performed adequate and proper testing in some Canadian markets for performance claims made in relation to its Chatr Wireless brand (see: Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:18 am
Supreme Court, in McIntyre v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 1:02 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice released its decision on an application in York University v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]