Search for: "Lawrence v. Lawrence" Results 221 - 240 of 4,838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The most striking example is provided by the balancing test announced in Mathews v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:34 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Friday morning read: Supreme Court rejects challenge to California pork industry restriction (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News) Moore v Harper parties split on whether US Supreme Court should drop case (CJ Staff, The Carolina Journal) Supreme Court Throws Out Fraud Convictions in Albany Scandals (Adam Liptak & Luis Ferré-Sadurní, The New York Times) Supreme Court rules against Puerto Rican journalists seeking records from financial oversight board… [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 1:48 pm by Ilya Somin
The same Court that could fashion an enforceable constitutional entitlement out of every individual's "'right to define"' his or her '"own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life,"' Lawrence v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm by Ilya Somin
At one point, he sent an e-mail to Roberto Gonzalez, his law clerk working on the Kelo case, saying that "I don't think we need to reply [to Justice Scalia's draft dissent]—of course we do need five votes, but I don't think this reference to Lawrence [v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Lawrence Rosenthal (Chapman University, The Dale E. [read post]
3 May 2023, 3:30 am by Doron Dorfman
Even when striking down the Texas sodomy law and expanding constitutional protection to same-sex, nonmarital sexual relations in Lawrence v. [read post]