Search for: "Lee v. Doe et al"
Results 221 - 240
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
If the jury does not hear the bases of the opinion, it cannot meaningfully evaluate the opinion. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Chubin, et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:53 pm
However, as your lawyer can explain to you, you can still probably bring a claim for violation of the California Unfair Competition Law (California Business & Professions Code 17200 et al.) and/or for penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act (California Labor Code § 2698 et al.). [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am
Dan Kahan et al.: SCt said no reasonable jury could find other than that the police officers in this high speed chase acted reasonably, but Kahan found significant variation in evaluations of reasonableness based on salient demographics. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
Ltd. et al. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:43 am
Combay Inc. et al. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:44 am
Evidence from India; Lakshmi Iyer et al, Political Representation and Crime: Evidence from India; India Development Foundation, Judicial Impact Assessment: An Approach Paper. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:44 am
Evidence from India; Lakshmi Iyer et al, Political Representation and Crime: Evidence from India; India Development Foundation, Judicial Impact Assessment: An Approach Paper. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am
Autonomy Corp., PLC, et. al. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am
Those cases are Freeman, et al., v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 9:17 am
Yolanda Higuera Linan, et al., No. 09-0613 (per curiam) (on reh’g) (DDB). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
Espinosa et al., No. 1:10mj453 et al. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:39 am
Lee Tawes, III v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
L. 79-93 (2010).COASTAL AREAS.Kalen, Sam, et al., Lingering relevance of the Coastal Zone Management Act to energy development in our nation’s coastal waters? [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:56 am
Kurz v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
Such an employee resembles an independent contractor who can shift from firm to firm at low cost to either employee or employer.[4] Because the relationship between such employees and the corporation does not create appropriable quasi-rents, opportunism by the board is not a concern. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
HUGH CASSIDY et al., Defendants, Cross-Complainants, and Respondents, WILLIAM STRAW, Cross-Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
