Search for: "Levinson v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2017, 10:04 pm by Barry Barnett
The Second Circuit had held that “for ‘securities that are not traded on a domestic exchange,’ a transaction is considered ‘domestic if [1] irrevocable liability is incurred or [2] title passes within the United States.'” Petrobras, slip op. at 22 (quoting Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 11:44 pm
Lenz, UNITED STATES: D7O INSURANCE: THE STAND-ALONE "SIDE A" DILEMMA WHAT IS IT (AND DO WE NEED IT)? [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
The Illinois / Chicago resource guide for individuals with cerebral palsy and special needs was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:50 am by JB
The rot has been growing for some time, and has now reached the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:15 pm by Mark Murakami
The goal of the present law is to fill vacancies in the State Legislature and the United States Senate in a timely manner when such vacancies occur. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable onVoting Rights, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022.Sanford Levinson First I must express my continued thanks to the persons actually behind this remarkable project, Richard Albert, Ashley Moran, and Trish Do. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm by Schachtman
It is unprecedented in 49 prior trials and depositions where I have testified, in federal and state courts all over the United States, including many cases in Texas. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am by Kiran Bhat
United States, by a vote of six to three, the Court held that a federal district court has the discretion to order a federal criminal sentence to run after a state criminal sentence that is anticipated but has not yet been imposed. [read post]