Search for: "Long Term Capital Holdings v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 642
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
These philosophies also found their way into the controversial 2010 SCOTUS decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 8:31 am by Robert Chesney
In some states capital charges are available in some circumstances. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The petition further alleged that the mother slapped and bit the child, and left him unsupervised for long periods of time. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
”  (Source: here ) No contingency fee system:  Contingency fee arrangement has been one of the distinguishing features of litigation in the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The Bladensburg Peace CrossThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that a cross-shaped monument may be preserved on public land because it does not violate the Constitution's Establishment Clause.Cultural property watchers may not have noticed the case of American Legion et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, which holds that in a prosecution under a federal statute that prohibits certain categories of people from possessing firearms, the government must prove that the defendant knew he possessed a firearm and that he knew he belonged to the relevant category. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan Shaub
” But I also noted that the decision, though unprecedented, was “grounded in the executive branch’s long-standing, but expansive, view of executive privilege” and represented “the next logical step in the constitutional one-upsmanship that has characterized the actions of both branches over the past 30 years. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 03972 (2d Dept., 2019) the Appellate Division held, inter alia, that Supreme Courts properly denied the fathers motion which were to hold the mother in civil contempt. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by John Elwood
Arizona, 18-1109, asks whether a court must apply current law when deciding, for the first time but long after the flawed original sentencing, whether the mitigating and aggravating evidence in a capital case warrants the death sentence. [read post]
12 May 2019, 2:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[emphasis added] Daniel Defoe‘s certainty of (death and) taxes appears to hold true, even for those who hold themselves free of the same. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The United States Supreme Court is expected to conference on Charles Rhines’s petition for certiorari on April 12, 2019. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:29 am by John Stigi
Mar. 27, 2019), the Supreme Court of the United States (Breyer, J.) held that an individual who did not “make” a false or misleading statement within the meaning of Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Raskin said that while a Constitutional amendment to reverse Citizens United is a long-term goal, Congress should now invoke Justice Kennedy’s admonition in Citizens United that the methods of “corporate democracy” can mitigate abuses by executives regarding corporate political spending. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:13 am by Marty Lederman
  Either way, that practice, standing alone, does not implicate Establishment Clause concerns.Second, as the Court reaffirmed last Term in the Travel Ban case, Trump v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
  The political economy of international standard setting in financial reporting: how the United States led the adoption of IFRS across the world. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
At a minimum, the court may hold the case until Carpenter v. [read post]