Search for: "Long v. Davis" Results 221 - 240 of 2,056
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “It is well settled that “[a]n attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479,482 [1st Dept 2018], citingAmbase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
Second, we present evidence on public-company disclosures consistent with issuers’ understanding that the SEC has long had authority to take regulatory action in this area. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
In that statute, Congress exercised its power under Section 3 to lift the disabilities that the provision had imposed upon large categories of Confederate officers and officials—in essence, all but the highest-ranking ones, like Confederate president Jefferson Davis. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
Sadly, I find I’ve still written a tiresomely long post (not assisted by the fact that even as I sat down to write it there were more judgments coming from one Mostyn J). [read post]
24 May 2022, 9:05 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Davis and his coauthors situate their argument for antiracist antitrust law in the context of Cung Le v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 7:07 pm by Guest Author
Tenure-protected ALJs have long made initial adjudicatory determinations which are subject to the final approval of administrative agency heads within the executive branch. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In light of the discretion imparted by the consent form, “the plaintiff[s’] contention that the alleged malpractice resulted in legally cognizable damages is conclusory and speculative inasmuch as it is premised on decisions that were within the sole discretion of the [hospital]” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d at 848; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 436; Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d at… [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]