Search for: "Long v. Davis" Results 221 - 240 of 2,081
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Under Title VII, religious objectors can get exemptions from generally applicable work rules, but only so long as the exceptions don't create an "undue hardship" to the employer, which is to say so long as they impose only "de minimis costs. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 10:08 am by Scott Hervey
It’s been a long-standing practice. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In 1889 SCOTUS defined religion in Davis v Beason, making reference to Madison, as follows: ‘The term “religion” has reference to one's views of his relations to his Creator, and to the obligations they impose of reverence for his being and character, and of obedience to his will’. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
But it is an open question whether the transferor might still be secondarily liable (see, eg, Paul S Davies Accessory Liability (Hart Publishing, 2017) chapter 6). [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm by Brandon Duke
Judge Davis dissented and disagreed with all three holdings. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Moreover, a petitioner's lack of a reasonable excuse for the failure to timely serve a notice of claim is not necessarily fatal when weighed against other relevant factors (see Matter of Tejada v City of New York, 161 AD3d at 877; Matter of Davis v County of Westchester, 78 AD3d at 699). [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Moreover, a petitioner's lack of a reasonable excuse for the failure to timely serve a notice of claim is not necessarily fatal when weighed against other relevant factors (see Matter of Tejada v City of New York, 161 AD3d at 877; Matter of Davis v County of Westchester, 78 AD3d at 699). [read post]