Search for: "Low v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 7:39 am
On one level, United States v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 4:05 am
"Well, my old colleague and mentor would probably be pleased about the United States Supreme Court's decision this past week in Ashcroft v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am
On the point of absence of power, Carnwath stated that there was statutory authority provided by the EU Regulation 81, which was given effect by the European Communities Act 1971, to satisfy the principle in Entick v Carrington that interference by the state with individual property rights cannot be justified by the exercise of prerogative powers, unsupported by specific statutory authority. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 9:29 pm
United States and Matters of Evidence Before the International Court of Justice Fernando Lusa Bordin, The Nicaragua v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
In Cleveland County, Oklahoma, a woman has filed suit is state court seeking a religious accommodation that would allow her to obtain a driver's license with a low resolution photograph instead of the state-required high-resolution photo that captures biometric data. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 71.9 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm
United States, Justice Neil Gorsuch’s majority opinion made a clear point about Chevron deference in the context of an otherwise low-key statutory-interpretation case. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 9:23 am
United States v. de Perez, No. 07-CR-361-1 (JBW), 2007 WL 3010587 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:58 am
The other appeal, Holder v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:54 am
For instance, in a 2009 case, United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 6:34 am
Class actions and data protection claims Class actions, in which a single person is permitted to bring a claim and obtain redress on behalf of a class of people who have been affected in a similar way by alleged wrongdoing, have long been possible in other jurisdictions including the United States, Canada and Australia, but at present there is no such regime in the United Kingdom other than the representative action route. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 2:23 pm
Case: M Waikiki v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 1:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 4:25 am
” United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 12:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
Recently in the case of Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., the Supreme Court of the United States found two patents invalid because they claimed subject matter that was not patentable. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
Recently in the case of Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., the Supreme Court of the United States found two patents invalid because they claimed subject matter that was not patentable. [read post]
