Search for: "MATTER OF APPELL v. Appell" Results 221 - 240 of 25,342
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 4:55 am by Steve Chemaly
The appellants obtained California court orders instructing the respondent to turn over the shares to the appellants. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:15 am
Today's declaratory judgment law opinion: Jefferson Solar, LLC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 9:08 am
Today's advance release tort law opinion: Cardoza v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:49 pm by Michael Oykhman
R v Czegledi held that the offence requires “some violence, or threatened violence, upon someone in occupation, and who might resist. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division… [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The Appellate Division's decision also notes that mandamus "will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought", citing Matter of Wyche v Haywood-Diaz, 206 AD3d 748. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The Appellate Division's decision also notes that mandamus "will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought", citing Matter of Wyche v Haywood-Diaz, 206 AD3d 748. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]