Search for: "MATTER OF J W" Results 221 - 240 of 2,604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
The European Commission’s White Paper on Artificial Intelligence has been analysed by the Data Matters Blog. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm by familoo
Russell J is highly – highly – critical of the local authority. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 11:10 pm
The W$J quoted an anonymous source on the negotiations: "At the end of the day, what Bear Stearns was looking at was either taking $2 a share or going bust. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:46 am by Dave
The Court of Appeal have refused permission to appeal in Brent LBC v Stokes [2010] EWCA Civ 626 (not on Baili yet) - we reported the High Court judgment here, which contains the summary of the facts and the important decision of King J. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:46 am by Dave
The Court of Appeal have refused permission to appeal in Brent LBC v Stokes [2010] EWCA Civ 626 (not on Baili yet) - we reported the High Court judgment here, which contains the summary of the facts and the important decision of King J. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:53 am
" Id. at *6.Of Note: Castillo will be a seminal cases on subject-matter jurisdiction to hear a criminal conviction appeal. [read post]
13 May 2009, 10:48 am
Contract grievance procedures must be exhausted before a grievance is ripe for consideration by the courts Contract grievance procedures must be exhausted before a grievance is ripe for consideration by the courts Matter of Julicher v Town of Tonawanda, 2009 NY Slip Op 03273, Decided on April 24, 2009, Appellate Division, Fourth Department Dismissed from his position, Joseph J. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:21 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, "[w]here a hearing court has conducted a complete evidentiary hearing, its finding must be accorded great weight, and its grant of custody will not be disturbed unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record" (Matter of Oates v Wilson, 46 AD3d 904, 905 [2007], quoting Matter of Brian S. v Stephanie P., 34 AD3d 685, 686 [2006]; see Miller v Pipia, 297 AD2d 362, 364 [2002]; Young v Young, 212 AD2d 114, 117 [1995]). [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Peter Rawlings
” Additionally, Rule 45 obliges a court to quash or modify a subpoena that imposes an undue burden or requires disclosure of “privileged or other protected matter. [read post]