Search for: "MATTER OF K A B"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
Since A 100(b) was a matter which had already been decided by the OD, the Board found it suitable not to remit the case only because further opponents had now provided new lines of argumentation within this ground of opposition. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 4:31 pm
K-V Pharmaceutical Company, C.A. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Hence the biological activity of these compounds is not an essential technical feature of the claimed subject-matter, and thus not part of the definition of the claimed subject- matter. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:52 pm
B. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:30 am
Teno, Rebecca Anhang Price, and Lena K. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
The subject matter claimed in claim 1 of said European patent EP-B-1 795 246 thus differs from the subject matter in accordance with claim 1 of the main request of the patent under appeal firstly in that it relates to an air cleaner, and not to a filter element arrangement; and secondly, as regards the filter arrangement which forms part of the said air cleaner, at least by the claim features highlighted above. [5.3] In decision T 1391/07 [2.6-7], the board saw no basis… [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:02 am
[Examples from Appendix K:] SA Michelle Bravo, Mrs. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 11:51 am
Posted By: Robert B. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 2:15 am
» Der EDÖB kündigte damals an, «in den nächsten Wochen […] noch weitere und ausführlichere Informationen zum Sachverhalt [zu] erhalten. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:09 pm
These visas include the following: K-1, K-2, K-3, or K-4 visas for fiancé(e)s, children, and spouses of U.S. citizens U.S. citizenship Lawful permanent residents seeking to become U.S. citizens can apply for naturalization before the USCIS. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm
LASSILA and LINDA K. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board is of the opinion that this applies mutatis mutandis to a disclaimer trying to exclude subject-matter that is not encompassed by the claim at all. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:27 pm
Could Uber be required as an antitrust matter to open its system to Hailo drivers? [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 3:57 am
Furthermore, the Vice-Chairperson after two years of his or her appointment is eligible to become to Chairperson (as per Section 85(1)(b)). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 5:53 am
William K. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:34 am
Ashley, Anne B. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 5:01 pm
However, CPLR 2307(b) provides that, as a general rule, the production of photostatic copies constitutes compliance with a subpoena issued under CPLR 2307(a). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
The Board then stated:[4] In summary, the board finds that claim 1 of both requests relates to the technical implementation of excluded matter in the form of game rules. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 10:14 pm
No matter our behavior, the economy fluctuates from boom to bust on a fairly predicable basis. [read post]
