Search for: "MATTER OF M N" Results 221 - 240 of 3,869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2014, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
La présente demande (EP2) avait été rejetée pour cause de double brevetabilité car revendiquant, pour la division d'examen, le même objet que le brevet parent EP1.Tandis que EP1 revendique une seconde utilisation thérapeutique sous la forme d'une revendication de type suisse, EP2 revendique la même utilisation, mais sous la forme désormais admise d'une composition (Art 54(5) CBE).La Chambre examine ce que… [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Initially, we disagree with the Supreme Court's conclusion that the mother defaulted on the petition (see CPLR 321; Matter of Kindra B., 296 AD2d 456 [2002]; Matter of Tyrell M., 283 AD2d 500 [2001]). [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 10:05 am
And everyone is entitled to be treated with dignity, no matter what, no matter who they are. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 11:03 am
Lozano, Wyoming State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion in In re Brianna M.: In re Brianna M An excerpt: Francisco contends finally that he is a member of the Gila River Community, a federally recognized Indian tribe. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 3:12 pm
El documento se ha elaborado conjuntamente entre la Asociación Yoruba de Cuba y la Comisión Organizadora para la letra del Año Miguel Febles Padrón. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Zachary Spilman
This week at the Supremes: I’m not aware of any new military justice developments at SCOTUS. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
If a matter was not commenced on the Estates List, yet falls into one of the categories mentioned above, the matter can be transferred to the Estates List on consent, or on a motion, to either a judge who is hearing the matter (but not sitting on the Estates List), or a judge sitting to hear matters on the Estates List. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Conduct of a lawyer, no matter when it has occurred, is always relevant to the question of fitness to practice. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:48 pm by Tobias Lutzi
C’est dans l’arrêt Engler que la Cour a, pour la première fois, indiqué clairement qu’elle n’interprète « pas [l’article 5, point 1, du règlement nº 44/2001] de manière étroite ». [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 6:18 am by Brian M. Peterson
" The court will not assume that even use of the "n" word is unwelcome. [read post]