Search for: "MATTER OF T J B" Results 221 - 240 of 3,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2011, 2:59 am by war
Hamerschlag J rejected the licensor’s, Lardken’s, argument that neither of the matters were disputes within the scope of the arbitration clause, cl. 19(b): (b) All disputes arising in connection with this Licence, which are not adjusted by Licensing Agreement between the parties concerned, shall be finally settled by arbitration. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:50 am by Roel van Woudenberg
(henceforth jointly referred to as opponent O2) citing Articles 100(a) and (b) EPC.III. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 11:00 am by Oliver G. Randl
The residence or principal place of business of the professional representative used is of no relevance in that matter (T 149/85 [6]). [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:28 pm by Mark Astarita
He neither admitted nor denied the findings in the order.AgFeed's former CFO Clayton T. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
This was an appeal from the United States District Court for theMiddle District of Florida in No. 3:11-cv-00819-TJC-JRK,Judge Timothy J. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
First, the court agreed with Brenda that the Petition failed to state a claim under rule 12(b)(6) for modification of custody. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am by Jessica Kroeze
The intention to authorise debiting of the deposit account does NOT already allow the EPO to act on such authorisation and carry out such intent where the EPO, under the deposit account system, already holds such money in trust (deviation in particular from T 1265/10, at point 15), (see point 3.4.3 of the quotation from the summons under point 1 of the Reasons).2. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am by Jessica Kroeze
The intention to authorise debiting of the deposit account does NOT already allow the EPO to act on such authorisation and carry out such intent where the EPO, under the deposit account system, already holds such money in trust (deviation in particular from T 1265/10, at point 15), (see point 3.4.3 of the quotation from the summons under point 1 of the Reasons).2. [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:15 am by Mandelman
If you aren’t already familiar with Johnson, you’re in for a real treat. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The present decision illustrates this fact.Claim 1 before the Board read (in English translation):Storage device with variable storage capacity, in particular for storing rod-shaped products, the storage device comprising:[a] an input area (47), an output area (48) and[b] a continuous conveying element (62) connecting the input area (47) to the output area (48) in such a way that the storage device (10) operates on the principle of “first in-first out” (FiFo store),[c] the… [read post]