Search for: "MERRELL"
Results 221 - 240
of 601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2017, 10:18 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals meant the trial court had a duty to perform certain gatekeeping functions with regard to its expert witnesses, and yet the court failed to do so. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:28 am
Featuring, Debra Ginyard, Wendy William’s make-up artist Merrel Hollis, fashione editor Darryl Brown, just to name a few. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Follow EEOC Commissioner Chai Feldblum on Twitter — from Jeff Nowak’s FMLA Insights On the EEOC radar: Pregnancy and caregiver discrimination — from John Holmquist’s Michigan Employment Law Connection When illegal interview questions are legal — from Evil HR Lady, Suzanne Lucas Linguistic Challenges in the Workplace — from Southwest Florida HR Law & Solutions Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act (“GINA”) — from Texas… [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 9:10 am
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993)]; and (3) the testimony assists the trier of fact, through the application of scientific, technical, or specialized expertise, to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.That is perhaps a reasonable test, but it doesn’t happen to be the same as the three-part test that Rule 702 quite explicitly enumerates, to wit: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the… [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:54 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:20 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals are meant to prevent theories based on shaky science from cluttering up court proceedings and confusing juries. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.? [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 10:24 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993); see also Weisgram v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:03 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States Supreme Court ruled that federal judges may no longer use the proxy of general acceptance by specialists as the test for determining the admissibility of scientific testimony. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:01 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals,” a precedent-setting case on expert witnesses. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Garza--Did the Supreme Court really mean what it said in Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
The “ball ” that the plaintiffs could not avoid was causation, thanks to Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:06 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm
Merrell Dow Pharma., Inc., 791 F. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 12:15 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:10 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:58 am
The panel will be part of a webinar series run by Jessica Miller-Merrell on her blog, Blogging4Jobs. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 10:24 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 791 F. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:16 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
Merrell Dow did not have to rule out any possibility of causation; the plaintiffs had to establish causation. [read post]
