Search for: "MITCHELL v. STATE" Results 221 - 240 of 2,018
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2022, 5:19 pm by Patricia Salkin
A Nevada federal district court addressed various constitutional claims related to tiger keeping in a 2021 case, Mitchell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Our interns, Mitchell Beebe, Elena Botts, Kayla DeAlto, Austin Max Scherer, Teddy David, Jamie Jang, Kenneth Boggess, and Julia V. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Our interns, Mitchell Beebe, Elena Botts, Kayla DeAlto, Austin Max Scherer, Teddy David, Jamie Jang, Kenneth Boggess, and Julia V. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:26 am by Tom Smith
They point to an earlier parochial school funding case, Mitchell v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 8:34 am by Josh Blackman
This position parallels the United States Supreme Court's current approach to the Free Exercise Clause pursuant to Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 4:26 am by Peter Mahler
Kahn III, last week handed down its decision in Kinyk v Hart, this time denying the motion on the merits. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"When evidentiary material outside the pleading's four corners is considered, and the motion is not converted into one for summary judgment, the question becomes whether the pleader has a cause of action, not whether the pleader has stated one, and unless it has been shown that a material fact as claimed by the pleader is not a fact at all, and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it, dismissal should not eventuate" (Matter of Clavin v… [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"When evidentiary material outside the pleading's four corners is considered, and the motion is not converted into one for summary judgment, the question becomes whether the pleader has a cause of action, not whether the pleader has stated one, and unless it has been shown that a material fact as claimed by the pleader is not a fact at all, and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it, dismissal should not eventuate" (Matter of Clavin v… [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 1:30 pm by CMS
On 13 October 2021, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Anwar v The Advocate General (representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy) [2021] UKSC 44. [read post]