Search for: "Martin v. Settle" Results 221 - 240 of 604
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
-> High Court Last Hope for Copyright Lawsuit Over Google Book Scanning – WSJ https://t.co/Sb9VtuIO9I -> Canadian economy needs to evolve https://t.co/mqMLJJ3a7x -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-02-08 https://t.co/07EmDZkoAX -> Netflix border crackdown cuts off some customers, but unblocking services fight back https://t.co/7uF1LBbp9i -> Happy Birthday: Warner offers up to $14M to settle copyright dispute https://t.co/xJg8uU7sqs -> Competition Tribunal… [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Mark Hickford, Victoria University of Wellington Faculty of Law, has posted “Settling Some Very Important Principles of Colonial Law”: Three “Forgotten” Cases of the 1840s, published in Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 2004: 1-30.This article reintroduces the 'forgotten" cases of R v Taylor, Attorney-General v Whitaker and Scott v Grace and considers their specific historical contexts. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Netflix border crackdown cuts off some customers, but unblocking services fight back https://t.co/7uF1LBbp9i -> Happy Birthday: Warner offers up to $14M to settle copyright dispute https://t.co/xJg8uU7sqs -> Competition Tribunal continues to limit access to private ‘refusal to deal’ actions https://t.co/tyhuUqABYi -> Martin Shkreli has a new problem: Artist sues over portraits on $2-million Wu-Tang Clan album https://t.co/gHi161MwE7 -> Spray-on law: Even… [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A sizeable estate permits adequate compensation, but nothing beyond that (Martin v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 4:19 pm by Ben Vernia
Martin, 796 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2015), which rejected the application of the “government benefits” provision in such cases; and a Third Circuit decision, U.S. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The federal district court, however, refused to accept the stipulation as submitted, concluding that Cheeks could not agree to a private settlement of his FLSA claims without either the approval of the district court or the supervision of the United Stated Department of Labor [DOL].The US Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the district court's holding ruling that in the absence of such approval, parties cannot settle their FLSA claims through a private stipulated dismissal with… [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm by INFORRM
* Cripps v Vakras – $450,000 ($100,000 aggravated damages) * Pedavoli v Fairfax Media – $350,000 – hard copy and online * Polias v Ryall – $340,000 (Facebook and gossip) * North Coast Children’s Home Inc v Martin – $250,000 * Tassone v Kirkham – $176,408.81 * Fisher v Channel Seven Sydney – $125,000 (Today Tonight) * Visscher… [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
As Martin Hickman reported on Byline, Mr Wallis made a statement outside court attacking what he said was a “politically driven campaign against the press”. [read post]