Search for: "Matter of Gomez v Gomez" Results 221 - 240 of 246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am by Matthew Ackerman
  On the Second Circuit, the guard would have the burden of establishing that his or her actions were either reasonable as a matter of law or that the right was not clearly established (more on this in a minute). [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Gomez-Herrera, No. 07-10153 A sentence for illegal reentry following removal is affirmed over a primary claim that Kimbrough v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
-M.Th.D. ten Napel,  Leiden Law School, Institute for Public Law, Section of Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Netherlands, “Religious Pluralism, Eastern Ethnical Monism and Western ‘Civic Totalism’” Nicolae V. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Be very careful to make sure a Hawaii doctor knows an interview is voluntary, do not get into irrelevant matters, etc. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:02 pm
"I've been dealing with Stanford matters since December 2007," says O'Brien, who represents two of Stanford Group Co. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Accepting the “tainted” evidence generated by the unlicensed practice of medicine would contravene public policy.[12] Although the challenged physician had committed a criminal offense under Washington law, Judge Armstrong did not refer the matter to the King County prosecutor. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Gomez, 14-857, which was once rescheduled before its relist, (fittingly) involves an ad agency that, after being sued for an ill-advised text-message campaign for the U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:23 am by Moderator
Miami Beach-based Penrod International, which operates Nikki Beach, claims in a lawsuit filed Thursday in... 02/14/2011 John Pacenti Subscription Required Penrod International LLC dba Nikki Beach v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am by Joel R. Brandes
Family Court continued to assert temporary emergency jurisdiction over the matter. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
On the other hand, the issue is so undeniably important as a practical matter, and the courts are so splintered, that the Supreme Court should do something. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners)   Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law)… [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
Moreover, the majority does not consider the Supreme Court's most recent decision on the issue of agent liability in employee retaliation matters, Staub v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]