Search for: "Matter of Grand Jury Proceeding (Doe)" Results 221 - 240 of 853
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2020, 8:06 am by Nathaniel Sobel, Julia Solomon-Strauss
Vance “does not absolve the President of the need to affirmatively plead or show impropriety, and it does not categorically narrow the scope of materials that may be relevant to a grand jury. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Jack Sharman
Perversely, the best argument in favor of Zoom grand juries is that format does not matter because federal grand juries are prosecutorial tools and no longer shields for citizens against arbitrary government power. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
The doorkeeper applies this standard so strictly that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has recognized only three members: grand jury transcripts, warrant materials during the pre-indictment phase of an investigation, and attorney-client privileged materials. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 11:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Based on these factual allegations, … a grand jury charged the defendants in Count I of the Indictment with conspiring to obstruct justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 12:14 pm by Sami Azhari
This statute does not apply to judicial proceedings; Rather, this statute governs any proceeding before an administrative agency, department, or committee of the United States, including Congress. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:28 am by Amy Howe
But the decision in that case does not mean that the financial records that the grand jury seeks will be turned over: The court sent the case back to the trial court and agreed that the president could still argue that complying with this subpoena would interfere with his ability to do his job. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 6:58 am by Jack Goldsmith, Nathaniel Sobel
This post does a deep dive into what has been publicly reported about the Durham investigation, and then offers analysis. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
Furthermore, there is the matter of physicians reading the same X-ray in two, inconsistent ways. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am by David Kris
The executive branch believes that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) does not apply to otherwise-authorized, military cyber activity, and the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision on the CFAA in Van Buren v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am by Charlotte Butash
In response to the grand jury subpoena in the Vance case, Trump sued the district attorney and Mazars in federal district court. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
That subsection provides that a defendant is guilty of juror harassment when he “threatens . . . or intimidates [a] former juror or spouse [of a juror] . . . as a result of the prior official action of [the] juror in a grand jury proceeding or trial. [read post]
4 May 2020, 8:30 am by Michel Paradis
The report does not go so far as to endorse the creation of standing military courts. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:58 am by Jacquelyn Greene
Emergency Directive 3 does not prohibit in-person proceedings that are otherwise authorized by Emergency Directive 1. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:18 am by Jacob Tingen
Most relevant here is your right against self-incrimination, or, as noted in the Amendment: “No person shall be held to answer for a…crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger. [read post]