Search for: "Matter of Stanford"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2022, 2:51 pm
Stanford Law Professor Jane S. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
“A rule that freezes the definition of patentable subject matter in time will hobble new areas of innovation. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:21 am
In the Matter of Kestra Investment Services, LLC, Respondent (FINRA AWC)Former Stanford Group Company Chief Compliance Officer Files SEC Appeal With Wrong CourtBernerd E. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 3:15 pm
In my view, the treatment of Judge Kyle Duncan at Stanford Law School was awful. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 9:22 pm
In part 2 of the interview, which appears below, we move past the presumption of validity to several other patent matters, including reverse pharma payments and In re Ciproflaxacin, the Stanford Patent Prize, patent misuse, patent trolls and the usual fun questions with a heavy emphasis on science fiction. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 9:58 am
This past Monday night Chair White gave a keynote address at the 20th Annual Stanford Directors’ College where she spoke about the Commission’s “mindset” on certain matters relevant to directors. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:07 pm
My take on Judge-Duncan-at-Stanford differs from Rick's. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 12:17 pm
As an international law matter, the United States would be justified in using necessary and proportionate force in self-defense in response to an attack against a U.S. drone. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:24 am
Stanford Law’s Allen S. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 12:27 am
(The full 2010 Stanford/Cornerstone report can be found here.) [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:36 am
Allen Stanford, and three individual defendants, alleging that Stanford and his cohorts had engaged in a Ponzi scheme through the sale of sham certificates of deposit evidencing billions of dollars of investments. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 2:29 pm
Minow: Why does this matter? [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:39 am
See, e.g., Bd. of Trs. of the Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 1:10 pm
Judge Aaron Persky empathized with Brock Allen Turner and could easily imagine what it would be like to lose sports fame (as Persky enjoyed), to lose a Sanford education (as Persky enjoyed), to lose the sort of easy success and high regard that a young, reasonably affluent Stanford graduate (like Persky was) can expect as a matter of right. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:56 am
Dauber can take on any cause she wants, no matter how intellectually dishonest or irrational. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
However, does it really matter? [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 2:16 pm
We have our own group dynamic and we’re not immune from the phenomena we study.Commentators: Mark Lemley: If fairness matters to production, that needs to be part of our incentive theory. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
That someone becomes frustrated by heckling and changes their planned talk in response (as Judge Duncan apparently did, turning from prepared comments to a remarkably combative Q&A period) is simply not a matter of being shouted down. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:49 am
Stanford law Professor Henry T. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 10:12 am
No matter how false his statements about the electoral process, they almost certainly would fall within this immunity. [read post]
