Search for: "Means v. Means" Results 221 - 240 of 98,319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2015, 11:38 am by Erica Villanueva
Recently, the California Court of Appeal decided County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 7:54 am by Jason Kilborn
His rejection of legislative history and search for intent/purpose does not bode well for bankruptcy and consumer-protection disputes, such as Obduskey v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
”2 I do not agree that the specificationsof the two patents support that restrictive definition.Instead, I conclude that the district court properlydetermined that the terms “portable” and “mobile” wereused in their ordinary sense in the patent, and that thecourt properly instructed the jury to give those termstheir ordinary meaning. [read post]
12 May 2007, 10:05 am
” The court dismissed plaintiff’s dilution claim without further comment.The case cite is Rubber Stamp Management, Inc., v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 1:40 pm by Jonathan Bailey
In this case, the main decision of interest is the Cartoon Network, LP v. [read post]