Search for: "Miller v. State of Ohio"
Results 221 - 240
of 434
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm
Mar. 28, 2012); Miller v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
United States. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co., 461 F.3d 844 (7th Cir. 2006) (affirming summary judgment in disparate treatment discharge case, and noting judicial tendency to require “comparability” between plaintiffs and comparison group as a “natural response to cherry-picking by plaintiffs”); Miller v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
That case, Cutter v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am
Anticipating the theory later made famous by Justice Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:40 pm
Illinois, along with several other states, have initiated the re-sentencing of those who received life terms as juveniles following the 2012 Supreme Court decision in Miller v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:49 am
On March 12, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
On June 11, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:12 am
Miller, 44 S.W.3d 1, 11-12 (Tenn. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Bank (a 1893), and Miller v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 1:13 pm
Toward that end, the Northern District of Ohio recently gave us twin opinions applying the learned intermediary doctrine under the laws of California and Mississippi, and the district court found that the defendants in both cases were entitled to summary judgment.In Miller v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
City of Phoenix, 154 F.3d 972 (9th Cir. 1998) (applying void-for-vagueness analysis in a nonpublic forum); Miller v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm
Article 6 of the Civil Rights Law provides a formal procedure for changing a name, which provides the advantages of being speedy, definite and a matter of record as was done in Smith v United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 1:57 pm
Parisian’s Testimony: Miller v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm
Ohio 2010), and we blogged about it here. [read post]
