Search for: "Moran v. Moran" Results 221 - 240 of 558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
Sharif v The London Borough of Camden [2013] UKSC 10Does accommodation available for occupation by a person and those reasonably expected to reside with them have to be in one unit of accommodation? [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
Sharif v The London Borough of Camden [2013] UKSC 10Does accommodation available for occupation by a person and those reasonably expected to reside with them have to be in one unit of accommodation? [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Katz v Katz, 55 AD3d 680, 683; Moran v McCarthy, Safrath & Carbone, P.C., 31 AD3d 725, 726; Attinello v DeFilippis, 22 AD3d 514, 515; Tannenbaum v Tenenbaum, 8 AD3d 360; Lanzello v Lakritz, 287 AD2d 601; Bostrom v William Penn Life Ins. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 9:36 am
See also Ex parte Hicks, BPAI 2011 and Ex parte Moran, BPAI 2011. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:58 pm by Venkat
Moran Web-based Email Bombardment Campaign Does Not Amount to a Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act -- Pulte Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm by NL
The principles would also apply to all pre-decision accommodation or pending review or appeal, as it must also be suitable under Housing Act 1996 s.205 and s.206(1)As David notes, Lady Hale’s comments in Birmingham City Council v Ali; Moran v Manchester City Council [2009] UKHL 36 (our note here) to the effect that that accommodation which may be unreasonable for a person to occupy for a long period may be reasonable for him to occupy for a short… [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm by NL
The principles would also apply to all pre-decision accommodation or pending review or appeal, as it must also be suitable under Housing Act 1996 s.205 and s.206(1)As David notes, Lady Hale’s comments in Birmingham City Council v Ali; Moran v Manchester City Council [2009] UKHL 36 (our note here) to the effect that that accommodation which may be unreasonable for a person to occupy for a long period may be reasonable for him to occupy for a short… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Since an attorney-client relationship does not depend upon a formal retainer agreement or upon payment of a fee, the court must look to the words and actions of the parties (Moran v Hurst 32 AD3d 909, 911 (2d Dept 2006)). [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
Employee entitled to go for a cancer-screening examination without loss of pay or charge to leave accruals Moran v City of Saratoga Springs, et al, 21 Misc 3d 195 In Cruz et al v Wappingers CSD, Supreme Court, Dutchess County, Judge James V. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:31 pm by Venkat
Moran Web-based Email Bombardment Campaign Does Not Amount to a Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act -- Pulte Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:36 am by John Diekman
The doctrine applies only to legal determinations that were necessarily resolved on the merits in the prior decision, and to the same questions presented in the same case.Student note: On a claim to recover damages for unjust enrichment, equitable affirmative defenses could be properly asserted since the action is not one exclusively at law.Case: Moran Enters., Inc. v. [read post]