Search for: "N.Y. Supreme Court" Results 221 - 240 of 3,404
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 1:01 pm by Joel R. Brandes
N.Y., 2023) the district court adopted Sections III, IV, V and VI of Judge Levy’s Report and Recommendation and reserved decision on Sections I and II. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
On April 4, 2023, former president Donald Trump was arraigned and pleaded not guilty in New York State Supreme Court to state felony charges that he “repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal crimes that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:11 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Robinson 97 N.Y.2d 341 (2001), cases in which first the Supreme Court and then the New York Court of Appeals concluded that even if the officer’s primary reason in stopping someone was racist, courts would not examine an officer’s motivation in engaging in these stops, and such stops are not illegal. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In so ruling, the Third Department relied on the Court of Appeals’ decision in Miglino v Bally Total Fitness of Greater N.Y., Inc. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:18 am by Dan Bressler
Supreme Court to take up an appeal by Wild, who had sued to invalidate a 2007 non-prosecution deal between Epstein and U.S. prosecutors. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Notwithstanding this defect in the disciplinary procedure,* the appointing authority terminated Plaintiff's employment effective December 31, 2019.In response to Plaintiff's challenge to the appointing authority's action, Supreme Court concluded that the Board's determination was not arbitrary and transferred the matter to the Appellate Division.** The Appellate, noting that it is undisputed that "the hearing officer did not issue a report with findings… [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Notwithstanding this defect in the disciplinary procedure,* the appointing authority terminated Plaintiff's employment effective December 31, 2019.In response to Plaintiff's challenge to the appointing authority's action, Supreme Court concluded that the Board's determination was not arbitrary and transferred the matter to the Appellate Division.** The Appellate, noting that it is undisputed that "the hearing officer did not issue a report with findings… [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
Since the possessing museum and owners’ descendant had already reached a settlement, the court did not determine whether Schoeps’ predecessor’s loss of the paintings met the definition of having changed hands under involuntary means. [read post]
10 May 2023, 3:27 am by Jack Bogdanski
”You would think that Supreme Court ethics would be for the Judiciary Committee, not the Finance Committee, but what the heck, why spoil the fun? [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Supreme Court granted corporations essentially the same political speech rights that human beings enjoy. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Initiative, 3 (Apr. 1, 2020), https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/publications/diversity-c-suite. [4] Gormley, Gupta, Matsa, Mortal & Yang, supra note 3 at 38. [5] See Adam Liptak & Anemona Hartocollis, Supreme Court Will Hear Challenge to Affirmative Action at Harvard and U.N.C., N.Y. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am by admin
There is no effort to claim that somehow four Supreme Court cases, and thousand of lower courts, have erroneously viewed the whole process. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court.[6] One influential re-articulation came in Wisconsin v. [read post]